🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.